Global Mofy Metaverse Pursues $30 Million U.S. IPO Plan (GMM) – Seeking Alpha

Asian male office worker using augmented reality glasses outdoors to experience metaverse game at night

Jinli Guo/E+ via Getty Images

Jinli Guo/E+ via Getty Images
Global Mofy Metaverse Limited (GMM) has filed to raise $30 million in an IPO of its ordinary shares, according to an F-1 registration statement.
The firm provides 3D digital content generation technologies in China.
Given the risks involved, although the company is growing at a high rate of growth, I’m on Hold for the IPO.
Beijing, China-based Global Mofy Metaverse Limited was founded to develop a range of 3D content generation and related services for online and digital businesses in China.
Management is headed by Founder, Chairman and CEO, Haogang Yang, who has been with the firm since inception in 2017 and was previously co-founder of Hangzhou Shixingren Film Technology Co. and marketing supervisor of Shanghai Crystal Digital Technology Co.
The company’s primary offerings include:
Virtual Technology Service – 3D content production
Digital Marketing – Advertising production and promotion services
Digital Asset Development – 3D digital asset bank for different applications
As of March 31, 2022, Global Mofy has booked fair market value investment of $5.1 million from investors including James Yang Mofy Limited, Lianhe Universe Holding Group, New JOLENE&R L.P., and New Luyuchao Limited.
The company pursues large multinational clients as well as smaller firms through its in-house sales and marketing efforts.
Global Mofy positions itself in the market as a digital asset provider and enabler in the metaverse value chain.
Selling expenses as a percentage of total revenue have dropped as revenues have increased, as the figures below indicate:
Selling
Expenses vs. Revenue
Period
Percentage
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
0.8%
FYE September 30, 2021
1.0%
FYE September 30, 2020
2.1%
(Source – SEC)
The Selling efficiency multiple, defined as how many dollars of additional new revenue are generated by each dollar of selling spend, rose to 82.5x in the most recent reporting period, as shown in the table below:
Selling
Efficiency Rate
Period
Multiple
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
82.5
FYE September 30, 2021
64.2
(Source – SEC)
The term “metaverse” was first coined by Neal Stephenson in his science fiction novel Snow Crash.
Strictly speaking, the metaverse is a digital universe that is powered by blockchain technology and is home to decentralized applications.
It is a decentralized, persistent and secure online space where users can create avatars, buy virtual assets, and act in a digital space.
According to a 2022 market research report by Grand View Research, the global metaverse market was an estimated $38.9 billion market in 2021 and is forecast to reach $772 billion by 2030.
This represents a stunning expected CAGR of 39.4% from 2022 to 2030.
The main drivers for this expected growth are an increasing focus on the use of the internet to integrate digital and physical worlds, the growth of mixed reality hardware and software and the outbreak of the global pandemic.
As the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted traditional methods of doing business, working, and socializing, there is an increasing demand for digital platforms that can provide realistic and immersive experiences.
The pandemic has also created a need for social distancing, which has led to the popularity of online games and virtual reality (VR) as alternatives to real-life social interactions.
This has all contributed to the metaverse lately becoming one of the hottest trends in tech and business.
Also, below is the global metaverse market breakdown by end use in 2021:

Global Metaverse Market

Global Metaverse Market (Grand View Research)

Global Metaverse Market (Grand View Research)
Major competitive or other industry participants include:
BaseFX
SVHQ Media
International media developers and providers
The company’s recent financial results can be summarized as follows:
Growing topline revenue
Increasing gross profit but lowered gross margin
Uneven operating profit
Variable cash flow from operations
Below are relevant financial results derived from the firm’s registration statement:
Total Revenue
Period
Total Revenue
% Variance vs. Prior
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
$ 11,236,223
182.8%
FYE September 30, 2021
$ 14,268,184
183.0%
FYE September 30, 2020
$ 5,042,521
Gross Profit (Loss)
Period
Gross Profit (Loss)
% Variance vs. Prior
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
$ 1,960,130
204.9%
FYE September 30, 2021
$ 3,278,108
195.4%
FYE September 30, 2020
$ 1,109,588
Gross Margin
Period
Gross Margin
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
17.44%
FYE September 30, 2021
22.97%
FYE September 30, 2020
22.00%
Operating Profit (Loss)
Period
Operating Profit (Loss)
Operating Margin
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
$ 413,573
3.7%
FYE September 30, 2021
$ 1,396,164
9.8%
FYE September 30, 2020
$ (518,315)
-10.3%
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Period
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net Margin
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
$ 456,838
4.1%
FYE September 30, 2021
$ 1,417,891
12.6%
FYE September 30, 2020
$ (541,313)
-4.8%
Cash Flow From Operations
Period
Cash Flow From Operations
Six Mos. Ended March 31, 2022
$ 455,092
FYE September 30, 2021
$ (1,473,281)
FYE September 30, 2020
$ (1,104,232)
(Glossary Of Terms)
(Source – SEC)
As of March 31, 2022, Global Mofy had $1.4 million in cash and $7.2 million in total liabilities.
Free cash flow during the twelve months ended March 31, 2022 was negative ($906,834).
Global Mofy intends to raise $30 million in gross proceeds from an IPO of its ordinary shares, offering 6 million shares at a proposed midpoint price of $5.00 each.
No existing shareholders have indicated an interest to purchase shares at the IPO price.
Assuming a successful IPO, the company’s enterprise value at IPO would approximate $123 million, excluding the effects of underwriter over-allotment options.
The float to outstanding shares ratio (excluding underwriter over-allotments) will be approximately 20.0%. A figure under 10% is generally considered a ‘low float’ stock which can be subject to significant price volatility.
Management says it will use the net proceeds from the IPO as follows:

Proposed Use Of IPO Proceeds

Proposed Use Of IPO Proceeds (SEC)

Proposed Use Of IPO Proceeds (SEC)
Management’s presentation of the company roadshow is not available.
Regarding outstanding legal proceedings, management says the firm is not currently involved in any legal or administrative proceedings that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or operations.
The sole listed bookrunner of the IPO is Maxim Group LLC.
Below is a table of relevant capitalization and valuation figures for the company:
Measure (TTM)
Amount
Market Capitalization at IPO
$150,000,000
Enterprise Value
$123,172,771
Price/Sales
6.97
EV/Revenue
5.72
EV/EBITDA
61.85
Earnings Per Share
$0.07
Operating Margin
9.25%
Net Margin
9.42%
Float To Outstanding Shares Ratio
20.00%
Proposed IPO Midpoint Price per Share
$5.00
Net Free Cash Flow
-$906,834
Free Cash Flow Yield Per Share
-0.60%
Debt/EBITDA Multiple
0.76
CapEx Ratio
-33.46
Revenue Growth Rate
182.84%
(Glossary Of Terms)
(Source – SEC)
GMM is seeking U.S. public capital market investment for its various general corporate purposes and possible acquisitions.
The company’s financials have shown increasing topline revenue, higher gross profit but lowered gross margin, fluctuating operating profit, and uneven cash flow from operations.
Free cash flow for the twelve months ended March 31, 2022 was negative ($906,834).
Selling expenses as a percentage of total revenue have fallen as revenue has increased; its selling efficiency multiple rose to 82.5x in the most recent reporting period.
The firm currently plans to pay no dividends to public shareholders and to retain any future earnings for reinvestment back into the company’s growth initiatives.
The market opportunity for metaverse-related products and services is extremely large and expected to grow at a high rate of growth in the coming years, so the firm enjoys strong industry growth dynamics in its favor.
Like other firms with Chinese operations seeking to tap U.S. markets, the firm operates within a WFOE structure or Wholly Foreign Owned Entity. U.S. investors would only have an interest in an offshore firm with interests in operating subsidiaries, some of which may be located in the PRC. Additionally, restrictions on the transfer of funds between subsidiaries within China may exist.
The recent Chinese government crackdown on IPO company candidates combined with added reporting and disclosure requirements from the U.S. has put a serious damper on Chinese or related IPOs resulting in generally poor post-IPO performance.
Also, a potential significant risk to the company’s outlook is the uncertain future status of Chinese company stocks in relation to the U.S. HFCA Act, which requires delisting if the firm’s auditors do not make their working papers available for audit by the PCAOB.
Prospective investors would be well advised to consider the potential implications of specific laws regarding earnings repatriation and changing or unpredictable Chinese regulatory rulings that may affect such companies and U.S. stock listings.
Additionally, post-IPO communications from the management of smaller Chinese companies that have become public in the U.S. has been spotty and perfunctory, indicating a lack of interest in shareholder communication, only providing the bare minimum required by the SEC and a generally inadequate approach to keeping shareholders up-to-date about management’s priorities.
Maxim Group is the lead underwriter and IPOs led by the firm over the last 12-month period have generated an average return of negative (67%) since their IPO. This is a bottom-tier performance for all major underwriters during the period.
Risks to the company’s outlook as a public company include its exposure to the Chinese market, which is subject to unpredictable regulatory actions, the government’s ‘Zero-COVID’ policies, and uncertain financial regulatory environment in China and in the U.S.
As for valuation, management is asking investors to pay an Enterprise Value/Revenue multiple of approximately 5.7x.
Given the risks involved, although the company is growing at a high rate of growth, I’m on Hold for the IPO.
Expected IPO Pricing Date: To be announced.

Gain Insight and actionable information on U.S. IPOs with IPO Edge research.
Members of IPO Edge get the latest IPO research, news, and industry analysis.
Get started with a free trial!
This article was written by
I’m the founder of IPO Edge on Seeking Alpha, a research service for investors interested in IPOs on US markets. Subscribers receive access to my proprietary research, valuation, data, commentary, opinions, and chat on U.S. IPOs. Join now to get an insider’s ‘edge’ on new issues coming to market, both before and after the IPO. Start with a 14-day Free Trial.

Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This report is for educational purposes only and is not financial, legal or investment advice. The information referenced or contained herein may change, be in error, become outdated and irrelevant, or removed at any time without notice. You should perform your own research for your particular financial situation before making any decisions. IPO investing can involve significant volatility and risk of loss.

source

Leave a Comment